The alleged practice of fixing NFL (National Football League) games has long been a topic of debate and speculation within the sports community. Despite the numerous conspiracy theories, there is no concrete evidence to support the notion that game results are predetermined. The purpose of this article is to examine the claims and explore whether there is any substance behind the idea of fixed games.

Are NFL Games Fixed?

The scenario you presented—where the 49ers vs. Ravens game was allegedly fixed to end with a score of 20-17, with the Ravens winning—raises several intriguing questions. If we are to accept the scenario for argument's sake, we can explore who might have been involved and how such a thing could be coordinated. Let's delve into the potential stakeholders:

Stakeholders and Their Potential Involvements

1. Commissioner Roger Goodell: In theory, the Commissioner, as the highest authority, would have the most influence. However, it would be highly unlikely for him to engage in or authorize such activities, as it would severely damage the league’s reputation and trust.

2. Owners (e.g., Steve Bisciotti, Jed York): The NFL owners oversee the franchises, but there is no credible evidence to suggest that they would willingly jeopardize their team’s game by fixing it.

3. Quarterbacks and Teams(e.g., Jimmy Garoppolo, Lamar Jackson): It’s highly improbable that a player would voluntarily agree to a fixed game, especially when their reputation and careers are at stake.

What About Officiating and Referees?

Referees and officials would also have to be complicit in any fixed game scenario. However, the NFL has strict measures and protocols to prevent such cheating. Senior Vice President of Officiating Alberto Riveron would likely be among the first to investigate any alleged irregularities, as their actions directly impact the integrity of the game.

Evidence and Communication

For any alleged game fixing to occur, there would need to be clear and direct communication between the involved parties. This could potentially involve:

Video or audio recordings Email or text communications Person-to-person meetings

Until concrete evidence emerges, such as tapes or emails, suggestions of game fixing remain in the realm of speculation. The NFL has a vested interest in maintaining the integrity and fairness of its games, and its stakeholders are well aware of the severe consequences of such actions.

Similar Concerns About Game Results

Questions of game-fixing have been raised at various levels of the NFL, including:

Regular Season Games: The concern is that teams may fix their game results to achieve specific win-loss records or seedings in playoffs. Playoffs and Super Bowl: Pressure to generate revenue and maintain fan interest can sometimes lead to higher stakes, increasing the motivation for game manipulation.

Communication Among Stakeholders

If game fixing were a reality, it would require:

Coordination: Individual players, coaches, and officials would have to meticulously plan and execute their roles. Secretive Meetings: The involved parties would likely meet privately to discuss and coordinate the game-fixing. This could occur in: The Commissioner's Office or Deserted Island Meetings: While these scenarios are entertaining, they are highly unlikely and impractical.

Given the high stakes and potential for embarrassment and legal repercussions, the likelihood of such an elaborate scheme occurring is extremely low. The vast majority of the 1,500 players, hundreds of coaches, referees, and 32 owners understand the critical importance of maintaining the integrity of the game.

Conclusion

While the idea of fixed games in the NFL may seem plausible, it lacks substantial evidence to support it. The NFL has stringent measures to ensure fair play, and the potential consequences of any deceitful actions are too severe for stakeholders to risk. Game preparation, execution, and outcomes are a result of the skill, strategy, and performance of athletes, coaches, and officials, not predetermined outcomes.